引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 478次   下载 229 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于 SBE 法与 AHP 法的森林公园森林景观质量评价研究
尹旭, 张迪, 林书航, 林婉奇, 林尹影, 唐 科
广州市众森林业有限公司
摘要:
以广州市石门国家森林公园 32 个景观样地为研究对象, 采用美景度评价法 (SBE 法) 和层次 分析法 (AHP 法) 对广州市石门国家森林公园的森林景观质量进行评价。 引入灰色统计法建立 3 个准则 层, 14 项评价因子的评价体系, 权重分布显示, 观赏特性多样性等 6 项评价因子对森林公园森林景观质 量影响较大; 景观样地的 AHP 评价结果为Ⅰ级景观 2 个, Ⅱ级景观 5 个, Ⅲ级景观 25 个, 无Ⅳ级景观, 且Ⅰ、 Ⅱ级景观样地中, 植物群落结构均为乔—灌—草, 表明植物生活型结构多样性对森林景观整体质量 具有很大的影响; 采用 Kendall??s W 协同系数对美景度评价法和层次分析法计算的 YSBE 与 YAHP 值进行一致 性检验, 得到 W = 0. 98, 渐进显著性 0. 007<0. 05, 表明美景度评价法与层次分析法的评价结果一致性高; 将经标准化处理的 YSBE 与 YAHP 汇总得到各景观样地的综合得分与排序。 结果显示, 森林公园森林景观质 量整体处于中等水平, 应通过提高森林公园重要节点色彩丰富度, 丰富植物群落层次等手段, 从景观美 学、 景观生态与景观行为心理 3 个方面, 提升森林公园森林景观质量。
关键词:  森林公园  森林景观  景观评价  美景度评价法  层次分析法
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Study on the Evaluation of Forest Landscape Quality in Forest Parks Based on the SBE and AHP Methods
yinxu, zhangdi, LIN Shuhang, LIN Wanqi, LIN Yinying, TANG Ke
Guangzhou Zhong-sen Forestry Co.Ltd
Abstract:
The forest landscape quality of Shimen National Forest Park of Guangzhou was assessed using the Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) procedure and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) on 32 selected landscape sites. To establish a comprehensive evaluation framework, Grey Statistical Analysis was introduced, resulting in the creation of 3 criterion layers and the inclusion of 14 evaluation factors. Weight distribution analysis revealed that 6 evaluation factors, notably the diversity of ornamental characteristics, had a substantial impact on the forest landscape quality of the park. The AHP evaluation classified the landscape sites into 2 Level I categories, 5 Level II categories, and 25 Level III categories, with no Level IV landscapes identified. Significantly, within both Level I and Level II landscapes, the plant community structure consistently exhibited a tree-shrub herb pattern, underscoring the significant influence of plant life form diversity on the overall forest landscape quality. A consistency test was conducted using Kendalls W concordance coefficient between the YSBE and YAHP values, resulting in a high level of consistency between the assessments derived from the SBE and the AHP, with W = 0. 98 and a significance level of 0. 007<0. 05. The comprehensive scores and rankings for each landscape site were obtained by summarizing the standardized YSBE and YAHP values. The findings revealed that the overall forest landscape quality in the park falls within the moderate range. Strategies to enhance the quality of the forest landscape in the park should consider aspects of aesthetics, ecology, and psychological factors related to landscape behavior, including improving color diversity at key park nodes and enriching the hierarchical structure of plant communities.
Key words:  Forest Park  Forest Landscape  Landscape Assessment  Scenic Beauty Estimation procedure  Analytic Hierarchy Process