引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被：浏览 43次   下载 48次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫！
分享到： 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
3 个色买提杏品系果实采收特征及差异的研究
彭彬1, 蒋靖2, 张效丰3, 李 葛4, 康 剑5
1.中国检验认证集团新疆有限公司;2.中国科学院新疆天文台;3.乌鲁木齐朴厚生态科技有限公司;4.国家林业和草原局国际竹藤中心;5.中国科学院 华南植物园
摘要:
色买提杏 Armeniaca vulgaris ‘Saimaiti’ 是新疆栽培果树中的重要品种, 为了明确不同品系色 买提杏果实采收特征及其差异, 研究以 3 个常见色买提杏品系的果实为研究材料, 分别测定果实形态特 征、 硬度、 可溶性固形物、 pH、 色度 (LAB) 等指标, 并对其进行核密度、 相关性分析。 结果表明: 3 个品系果实特征差异显著, 果实直径、 纵径、 侧径、 单果重均显示克孜勒色买提<色勒克色买提<木格亚 格勒克。 可溶性固形物是重要采收标志, 分别为克孜勒色买提 (14% ~ 15%)、 色勒克色买提 (18% ~ 20%)、 木格亚格勒克 (18% ~23%)。 硬度分化不明显, 集中分布于 21-30。 L 值表现为克孜勒色买提杏 (58. 30) >色勒克色买提杏 (56. 27) >木格亚格勒克 (52. 61), A 值表现为木格亚格勒克 (14. 60) >克 孜勒色买提 (13. 47) >色勒克色买提 (11. 52), B 值的分布范围在 39. 82 ~ 46. 20。 综上所述, 不同品系 的杏果实采收特征差异明显, 克孜勒色买提杏果实的品质相对较差。
关键词:  色买提杏  果实特征  品系  可溶性固形物
DOI：
分类号:
基金项目:
Study on Fruit Harvesting Characteristics and Differences of Three Strains of Armeniaca vulgaris ‘Saimaiti’
PENG Bin1, JIANG Jing2, ZHANG Xiaofeng3, LI Ge4, KANG Jian5
1.China Inspection and Certification Group Xinjiang Co. , LTD.;2.Xinjiang Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences;3.Urumqi Puhou Ecological Technology Co, Ltd;4.International Center for Bamboo and Rattan;5.South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Abstract:
Armeniaca vulgaris ‘Saimaiti’ is an important species among cultivated fruit trees in Xinjiang. In order to clarify the fruit harvesting characteristics and differences between different strains of Armeniaca vulgaris ‘Saimaiti’, in this study, the fruit of three common color Armeniaca vulgaris ‘ Saimaiti’ strains were used as research materials. The morphological characteristics, hardness, soluble solids, pH, chroma (LAB), and other indicators of the fruit were measured, and the kernel density and correlation were analyzed. The results showed that there were significant differences in fruit characteristics among the three cultivars. Fruit diameter, longitudinal diameter, lateral diameter, and single fruit weight all showed kezilemisabeti < celiksebeti < mugyagelker. Soluble solids were important harvest markers, which were kezilemisabeti (14%-15%), celiksebeti (18%-20%) and mugyagelker (18%-23%), respectively. Hardness differentiation was not obvious, and the distribution was concentrated between 21 and 30. L value was kezilemisabeti (58. 30) >celiksebeti (56. 27) >mugyagelker (52. 61), A value of mugyagelker (14. 60) >kezilemisabeti (13. 47) >mugyagelker (11. 52). The distribution range of B value was 39. 82-46. 20. In conclusion, the fruit harvesting characteristics of apricot of different strains are obviously different, and the fruit quality of kezilemisabeti apricot is relatively poor. The results are helpful in implementing more economical and efficient harvesting and management measures for Armeniaca vulgaris ‘Saimaiti’.
Key words:  Key words: Cymaiti apricot, fruit characteristics, variety, soluble solids