| 摘要: |
| 文章回顾了景观评价发展过程，阐述了景观评价四大学派的理论基础、基本理论、评价方法
和模式及优缺点。同时，依据评价侧重点的不同，将 3 大类型的评价方法特色总结为：一是侧重于对
“景”的研究评价，称为详细描述法或专家法；二是侧重于“观”的研究评价，称为公众偏好法或居民参
与法；三是“景”、“观”两者并重，称为量化综合法。从国家政策支持、理论引进与创新及国内评价实
例等方面梳理了国内景观评价的探索历程。 |
| 关键词: 景观评价 理论学派 评价方法 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:S722.5 |
| 基金项目:林业公益性行业科研专项“美丽城镇森林景观的构建技术研究与示范”(201404301)第一作者：杨洋(1987— ),女,工程师,主要从事园林规划设计、园林植物研究,E-mail:yangyang@sinogaf.cn 很大。但从更广的范围和更长的时间来看,好的景观往往是一致认可的,可见主体群的评价是规律和客观的。 |
|
| Research Progress of Landscape Evaluation |
|
Yang Yang,Huang Shaowei and Tanghonghui
|
|
Guangdong Academy of Forestry,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Forest Culture, Protection and Utilization,College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou,Guangdong Academy of Forestry,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Forest Culture, Protection and Utilization
|
| Abstract: |
| The theoretical basis, evaluation methods and advantages and disadvantages of four main
theoretical schools were discussed in this paper based on a conclusion of development of landscape evaluation. At
the same time, according to the evaluation of the different emphasis, the characteristics of 3 types of evaluation
methods were concluded as follows: type 1 focused on the evaluation of the “scenery”, called a detailed description method or expert method; type 2 focused on the research of“feel” , called the public preference or participation of residents; type 3 focused on “scenery” and “feel”, called comprehensive quantitative method. From the
aspects of national policy support, theoretical introduction and innovation, and domestic evaluation examples, this
paper combined the exploration course of domestic landscape evaluation, and provided a reference for the establishment of landscape evaluation system and evaluation practice for the future. |
| Key words: landscape evaluation theoretical school evaluation method |
