引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2175次   下载 2348 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
广东省林下植物碳含量和热值特征分析
张红爱,蔡安斌
广东省林业调查规划院,广东省岭南综合勘察设计院
摘要:
为准确估算广东地区林下植被碳储量和能量,应用湿烧法和氧弹式热量仪法对该地区共计 11 类林下植物的碳含量和热值进行了测定和分析,结果表明,碳含量大小顺序为杉木 (Cunninghamia lanceolata)(下木, 505.47 g/kg)>其它灌木(496.36 g/kg)>阔叶类(下木, 491.24 g/kg)>岗松 (Baeckea frutescens)(491.06 g/kg)>桃金娘 (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa)(476.62 g/kg)>竹灌(474.19 g/kg)>大 芒(Miscanthus floridulus)(473.60 g/kg)>芒萁 (Dicranopteris dichotoma)(469.09 g/kg)>小芒(M.sp.) (452.73 g/kg)>其它草类(411.28 g/kg)>蕨类(387.30 g/kg),总体上遵循下木>灌木>草本的规律; 热值大小顺序为下木杉木(19.83 MJ/kg) = 下木阔叶类(19.83 MJ/kg)>其它灌木(19.50 MJ/kg)>岗 松(19.47 MJ/kg)>桃金娘(19.13 MJ/kg)>芒萁(18.54 MJ/kg)>竹灌(18.11 MJ/kg)>大芒(17.86 MJ/kg)>小芒(17.77 MJ/kg)>蕨类(16.65 MJ/kg)>其它草类(16.35 MJ/kg),同样遵循下木>灌 木>草本的规律;植物碳含量与热值之间符合曲线相关,其实验数值大致遵循模型 y=0.000 3x2-0.192 1 x 53.383 6,其中 x 为碳含量(g/kg), y 为热值(MJ/kg), R2=0.907 7,该模型可用于筛选具有应用潜力 的能源植物。
关键词:  广东  林下植物  碳含量  热值
DOI:
分类号:S718
基金项目:其它
Characteristic Analysis of Carbon Content and Calorific Value of Undergrowth Plant in Guangdong Province
ZHANG Hong-ai and CAI An-bin
Forestry Surveying and Designing Institute of Guangdong Province,Lingnan Integrated Exploration and Design institute of GuangDong
Abstract:
In order to accurately estimate the carbon storage and energy of undergrowth plant in Guangdong province, the carbon content and caloric value of 11 species of underground plants in the area were measured and analyzed by wet burning method and oxygen bomb calorimeter method. The results showed that, (1) The carbon content rates in descending order are: Cunninghamia lanceolata (underwood, 505.47 g/kg) > other shrubs(496.36 g/kg)>broadleaf (underwood, 491.24 g/kg) > Baeckea frutescens(491.06 g/kg) > Rhodomyrtus tomentosa(476.62 g/kg) >underwood bamboo(474.19 g/kg) > Miscanthus floridulus(473.60 g/kg) > Dicranopteris dichotoma (469.09 g/kg) > M.sp. (452.73 g/kg) > other grasses(411.28 g/kg) > fern(387.30 g/kg). In general, the carbon content rates decreased from underplant, shrub, to grass. (2) The calorific value in descending order are:underwood chinese fir (19.83 MJ/kg) = underwood broadleaf (19.83 MJ/kg) > other shrubs (19.50 MJ/kg) > B. frutescens(19.47 MJ/kg) > R. tomentosa (19.13 MJ/kg) > D. dichotoma(18.54 MJ/kg)> underwood bamboo (18.11 MJ/kg) > M. floridulus (17.86 MJ/kg) > M.sp. (17.77 MJ/kg) > fern (16.65 MJ/kg) > other grasses (16.35 MJ/ kg). Similarly, the calorific value decreased from underwood, shrub, to grass. (3) Curve correlation was perceived between the carbon content rate and the calorific value, and observation values followed generally the model y=0.000 3x2-0.192 1x 53.383 6, where x (g/kg) denotes the carbon content rate, y (MJ/kg) denotes the calorific value, and R2=0.907 7.This model could be further applied to provide a theoretical reference on screening of potential energy plants.
Key words:  Guangdong  typical plant species under forestry  carbon content rate  calorific value