引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2561次   下载 2013 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
长岗山不同林分类型对土壤理化性质的影响
赵江宁,冯嘉仪,曾曙才
华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院,华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院,华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院
摘要:
以广州市长岗山自然保护区中的湿地松林(Pinus elliottii)、桉树林(Eucalyptus urophylla)和木荷林(Schima superba)为研究对象,对比不同林分类型、不同土壤层次下的土壤理化性质。结果表明:(1)土壤容重和吸湿水含量表现为湿地松林 > 木荷林 > 桉树林,土壤自然含水量、全氮和速效钾含量表现为湿地松林 > 桉树林 > 木荷林,土壤 pH、有机质和速效钾含量表现为桉树林 > 湿地松林 > 木荷林;(2)在不同林分类型 0~60 cm 土层下,土壤容重、自然含水量、有机质差异显著(P<0.05),土壤吸湿水含量、pH、全氮、速效磷、速效钾含量差异不显著;(3)不同土层深度、林分类型与土层深度交互作用下土壤理化性质无显著差异。
关键词:  土壤理化性质  林分类型  长岗山
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:华南农业大学校级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201510564239)
Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Forest Type in Changgang Mountain
Zhao Jiang-ning,Feng Jia-yi and Zeng Shu-cai
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,South China Agricultural University,College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,South China Agricultural University,College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,South China Agricultural University
Abstract:
To research the soil under Pinus elliottii forest, Eucalyptus urophylla forest and Schima superba forest in Changgangshan Natural Reserve of Guangzhou. We made a comparative study for the physical and chemical properties of soil under different forest types and in different soil layers. The results showed that:(1) the soil bulk density and hygroscopic water content under differernt forest type followed the linage order that P. elliottii forest >S. superba forest >E. urophylla; for soil natural water content, total nitrogen (TN) and available potassium(AK), the linage order was P. elliottii forest>E. urophylla forest >S. superba; for soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM) and available phosphorus (AP), the linage order was E. urophylla forest>P. elliottii forest>S. superba forest.(2)The soil bulk density, natural water content, SOM in the 0~60 cm soil layer of different forest types showed significant differences, but there were no significant differences between the soil hygroscopic water content, pH, TN,AP and AK.(3)The physical and chemical properties of soil showed no significant difference in different soil layers. Moreover, the physical and chemical properties of soil had no significant difference under the interaction of forest types and soil layers.
Key words:  soil physical and chemical properties  forest types  Changgang mountain